Perhaps Akhnaton-Moses, a historical evidence , will take credence as the reality of Tut being Akh's son became accepted as Gospel by the stodgy Egyptologist through something like the way Osmosis works in plants . Oedipus seems more likely to be understood and sooner accepted than the uprooting of Moses from his pedastal. Osman was brilliant at times , then "Out of Egypt " ..and oblivion. Villikovsky's "Akhnaton and Oedipus " was brilliant but "Worlds in Collision" has often been attacked which draws his earlier theories and reasoning into question. Archaeologist ,Barbara Thiering's Pesher reading of the Greek books of the New Testament dispel supernatural occurrences in favor of a secret historic recording of the events of that era but she was attacked viciously which ,again ,took her out of the American public library system. I flippantly told Osman and Barbara that if they presented their major theories as fiction they would have best sellers. I guess it's too late now. Barbara is in a home in Australia . I hope she is comfortable .
"Ignorance is bliss" or so they say ,but you can't un - eat the apple's knowledge .
